Supreme Court unanimously backs Trump deportation agenda, ruling federal courts must defer to immigration judges on asylum ...

The substantial-evidence review standard requires that a decision be upheld if it is supported by evidence that casts significant doubt to support a particular conclusion. The standard revolves around ...

Federal appeals courts must defer to immigration judges’ findings on whether asylum-seekers show harms serious enough to qualify for protection, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously.

The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that federal appeals courts must defer to the findings of immigration courts, rather than do their own fact-finding, when reviewing asylum claims, confirming the ...

After an immigration judge found their asylum claim lacking, a family facing threats in El Salvador pushed for review of the judiciary’s role in interpreting and applying protections for noncitizens ...

The Supreme Court unanimously sided with the federal government on Wednesday in Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, holding in an ...

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously held that federal appellate courts must be highly deferential to administrative adjudications when determining whether undisputed facts amount to ...

A unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court may significantly impact thousands of Cubans with active immigration ...

In a significant legal victory for the Trump administration’s immigration agenda, the Supreme Court of the United States ...

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to clear the way for it to end temporary deportation protections for more than 350,000 Haitian immigrants.